Under the Skin

I wasn’t sure what to expect from Under the Skin, having heard some incredibly mixed reviews, so I was pleasantly surprised by what I found.

Scarlett Johansson stars as a woman who drives around the streets of Scotland looking for men who won’t be missed if they, um, go missing.  That’s about it, really.  We never learn much about her or her motivations, only that as the film goes on, she begins to exhibit unhappiness with her situation and a reluctance to carry on, clearly questioning her previous actions.


I sort of don’t want to say any more about what little plot there is, in case you want to find out for yourself.  I think my enjoyment was greater, having gone in knowing little about what actually happens.  I will say that it really won’t be to everyone’s tastes: it’s incredibly slowly paced, there’s little action, not much of a story and many long silences and lingering shots that will frustrate many viewers.  There are some extremely peculiar images which leave you wondering what it all means, but they’re so nicely shot that I didn’t really mind.  I should also mention the wonderful score which sets exactly the right tone, sometimes increasing the tension to uncomfortable levels.  By the end I was saying “what in the name of arse did I just watch?” but, I found it strangely compelling in spite of this, and I think I sort of liked it.

Incidentally, I haven’t read Michael Faber’s book which this was based on, but the synopsis shows that there’s a lot more to the book than we ever learn in the film.  This isn’t a surprise to anyone who’s ever seen a film that was adapted from a novel, and while a truer adaptation might have been easier to digest, I still think the film is worthwhile on its own.

Score: 7/10

12 responses to “Under the Skin

  1. I liked this movie but I had no idea what the fuck was going 99% of the time.


  2. It is an arthouse film but a really well made one. I want to read the book now, and Im glad that it isnt a direct adaptation of that. Its great that the movie and book are different. If it was the same as the book it wouldn’t be that unique. Great review

    • Thanks very much! I wish I hadn’t read the whole book synopsis but I think I’d still like to read it. Definitely seems worth a go.

    • Yeah, I decided not to go because a good friend who is a really good barometer for me disliked it. Tbf I can’t help thinking I might have found it pretentious, annoying and wanky if I went to the cinema. I’d be interested to hear your thoughts if you catch it on dvd or streaming.

  3. Pingback: Lucy | filmnerdblog·

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s